The first and largest home of the Ogre Kingdoms — preserved.
Filter by date range
Standalone from the search box above — this queries Pagefind
directly and checks each result's date itself, since the packaged search
widget can only match a single exact date, not a range.
Hey everyone this will be my Gnoblog about my Dwarfs!!! Thanks, RS
Records: (Dwarfs) Played:4 Won:2 Drawn:0 Lost:2
Veijo06 Jan 2008
Yeah :bullface: Dwarfs are always good.. And welcome to the Ogre Stronghold!
rune smith06 Jan 2008
i konw they're good thanks, RS
Records: (Dwarfs) Played:4 Won:2 Drawn:0 Lost:2
rune smith06 Jan 2008
Just having a battle agaist Malekith now so I'll get a report up soon thanks, RS
Records: (Dwarfs) Played:4 Won:2 Drawn:0 Lost:2
rune smith06 Jan 2008
i had abattle with malekith and he won by more victory pts becuse we ran out of time thanks, RS
Records: (Dwarfs) Played:4 Won:2 Drawn:0 Lost:2
rune smith06 Jan 2008
I would like to play malekith again some other day when we get more time and hopefuly play 1000 pts thanks, RS
Records: (Dwarfs) Played:4 Won:2 Drawn:0 Lost:2
Wildcard06 Jan 2008
rune smith - too many 1-line posts here, you'll not get any responses unless you give a bit more detail and expand on your thoughts. Pleasse read the forum primer (link in my sig).
x105 - keeping pace with my wins!
Ogre achievements: 65/101 latest: maneater (play in 5 different venues)
Latest Fantasy Result:ogre kingdoms vs. high elves - 1500 points - win!
8th edition: 105/25/12 New ogres: 36/6/5
I was born and bred in a briar patch!
unknown07 Jan 2008
i second wildcard and say that you chose a good army! go dwarves!
rune smith07 Jan 2008
thanks for the advice wildcard I won't forget that and good say cloud,I will defet malekith one day. cheers, RS
Records: (Dwarfs) Played:4 Won:2 Drawn:0 Lost:2
rune smith17 Mar 2008
would this army of 500 points of dwarfs be good enough to take down this army of chaos
my army. josef bugman rune smith 15 rangers 1 bolt thrower 1 bolt thrower
dark ones army exalted champion 12 chaos warriors 16 maruders please return any infomation about the army thanks, rune smuth
Records: (Dwarfs) Played:4 Won:2 Drawn:0 Lost:2
Reg0617 Mar 2008
Eh, probably not. Joseph Bugman is very expensive, and special characters are best used in a large game where you can back up their cost with a large army. And you have two characters, which is excessive in a 500 point game, one of which is a runesmith (useless if the enemy has no wizards). Your only unit is a unit of 15 rangers. Which while good, are expensive, and have that special deployment rule. Let me repeat that, you have a single unit of expensive infantry, with no support or flank guards. The bolt throwers are nice, but ultimately aren't what you need. It breaks down to this; you have good, yet expensive troops, but you don't have an army. The chaos player will soak up what your bolt throwers can dish out, and once they reach you you don't have much in the way to beat them off with. Keep in mind I don't play dwarves.
Quote from: Ganymede on Mar 26, 2009, 11:17:45 AM
If by RAW, you mean "Reg06's Audacious Whims", then you'd be right.
Forum primer http://www.ogrestronghold.com/forum/index.php?topic=7241.0 Going Last Podcast; http://goinglast.net/
rune smith18 Mar 2008
I could get rid of bugman and put some warriors in the game and keep the bolt throwers but I have only to genrals a rune smith or josef bugman and i would get rid of the rangers and put longbeards in beacue it cost to many points i only need the rangers for bugmsn and put in a small unit of minorsso this could be my new army list. 1 rune smith, 15 longbeards, 15 warriors, 1 bolt throwerand 1 bolt thrower. is this good enough reg06 thanks, rune smith
Records: (Dwarfs) Played:4 Won:2 Drawn:0 Lost:2
_oNe_18 Mar 2008
I could get rid of bugman and put some warriors in the game and keep the bolt throwers but I have only to genrals a rune smith or josef bugman and i would get rid of the rangers and put longbeards in beacue it cost to many points i only need the rangers for bugmsn and put in a small unit of minorsso this could be my new army list. 1 rune smith, 15 longbeards, 15 warriors, 1 bolt throwerand 1 bolt thrower. is this good enough reg06 thanks, rune smith
Not an expert at dwarves and lacking the book atm but I'll give it a try. Fill me in if I'm mistaking myself concerning points. My advice would be to get a regular thane for the obvious reasons: It's less expensive and got an additional attack. Overall a better fighting profile. The Runesmith feels a bit useless with the cheaper option of the thane as i mentioned, espesially since that chaos player doesn't wield a sorceror. Should he opt. in taking a bound spell or so your 2 basic DD will work just as well.
Have you given your units any kinds of upgrades? Like full command? I'd go for that if you haven't.
And finally...How come the 2 bolt throwers? With those points you could easally put in some miners and expand your units to about 20 or getting like crossbowmen (better range than the hanguns) and expanding the units. Or taking both miners (a small unit of 5+ something) and adding some crossbowmen.
Pardon any unclear advices /// oNe
Errare humanum est, ignoscere divinum
Remember...Exposy Putty is your BEST friend!
Reg0618 Mar 2008
Just a small point, dwarves actually have 4 DD basic. So no runesmiths is plenty in a game under 1000 points.
Quote from: Ganymede on Mar 26, 2009, 11:17:45 AM
If by RAW, you mean "Reg06's Audacious Whims", then you'd be right.
Forum primer http://www.ogrestronghold.com/forum/index.php?topic=7241.0 Going Last Podcast; http://goinglast.net/
rune smith18 Mar 2008
I think the minors is a good idea becuse they are quite cheep in points and i'l put one bolt thrower but i dont have thane and full comand im not igsacly sure what a musition dose in a battle so could you tell me what it would do so this could be my army.
my army. 1 rune smith,great weapon 15 longbeards,great weapons and full command 15 quarrles, great weapons and full command 10 minors, with great weapons and full command 1 bolt thrower my calculations might be wrong but its good enough at the moment but keep ideas coming in fast. thanks, rune smith
Records: (Dwarfs) Played:4 Won:2 Drawn:0 Lost:2
Reg0618 Mar 2008
Use Bugman as a thane. When tied in combat a musician breaks the tie and you win by 1. They also add +1Ld when rallying.
Quote from: Ganymede on Mar 26, 2009, 11:17:45 AM
If by RAW, you mean "Reg06's Audacious Whims", then you'd be right.
Forum primer http://www.ogrestronghold.com/forum/index.php?topic=7241.0 Going Last Podcast; http://goinglast.net/
rune smith18 Mar 2008
So if I bugman as a thane and then get rid of the rune smith then my army would be like this. my army 1 thane with great weapon rune of stone and rune of striking 15 long beards with great weapon 15 warriors with great weapons 10 minors with great weapons should i use sheilds instead of great weapons. thanks, rune smith
Records: (Dwarfs) Played:4 Won:2 Drawn:0 Lost:2
Malekith18 Mar 2008
Nah, Dwarfs need to get in there as a threat, I don't usally see a list with Dwarfs having shields. For me Dwarfs and shields don't mix. Shields and DE on the other hand different story. Thanks, Malekith
= Rakarth The One Gnoblar Army! (And his helpers)
Last Dark Elf Result: 1000 pts vs Vampire Counts - Draw.
rune smith18 Mar 2008
so should stick with great weapons on my dwarfs thanks, rune smith
Records: (Dwarfs) Played:4 Won:2 Drawn:0 Lost:2
Lexy19 Mar 2008
Hold on! Now Malekith is a dark elves player and not a dwarves player. IF Lord Firmshaft doesn't come by to stop me, this would be it:
1 thane with great weapon rune of stone and rune of striking You can't have a rune of striking on a great weapon ( well not without another master rune). so lose the great weapon and take the rune of swiftness and rune of might. Rune of stone is okay, but give that dwarf a shield too. 15 long beards with great weapon 15 warriors with great weapons 10 minErs with great weapons should i use sheilds instead of great weapons.Miners can't have shields but for the rest try to get both ( shields against shooting and great weapons in combat)
Other comment: if you play a game and have normal setup( 24 inches apart) then you will have a problem. any army with shooting will get 4 or 5 rounds of shooting depending who goes first. This will happen: you get shot for 5 turns and at the end you will get charged with the few models you still have. Even if your miners get on the table early it's rather easy to counter that: one unit against a full army. when the miners are gone, they can focus on the rest of the units.
Try to get some shooting in your army. a unit of handgunners in stead of miners would already give you an edge in games at low points.
Cormorant on thundertusk ASL rule
Quote from: Cormorant on Aug 24, 2011, 05:46:24 PM
Now all we need is the 7th edition rule that said if the models are killed they don't get to fight and we WOULD be a broken army! lol
Ogre achievements: 41/101
rune smith19 Mar 2008
lexy thunderers wold be useful but thay cost more than minors but its a good idea so the army list should be like this at the moment my army list 1 thane with great weapons, rune of swiftness,rune of mightand rune of stone. 15 lomgbeardswith great weapons, 15 warriors with great weapons, 10 thunderers, 1 bolt thrower. That shold be my army but my calculations might be a little wrong so i'm not bothed if you count the points if you want so keep ideas comeinig in thanks, rune smith.
Opens a new GitHub Issue pre-filled with a link back here — sign in with GitHub to post. If someone already restarted this thread, please add to that issue instead of opening a second one.