The Ogre Stronghold

The first and largest home of the Ogre Kingdoms — preserved.

Filter by date range

Standalone from the search box above — this queries Pagefind directly and checks each result's date itself, since the packaged search widget can only match a single exact date, not a range.

challenges in the 2nd round of combat

original thread ↗

My friends were pouring over rules and they came up with that in the second round of combat RnF can attack in to the challenge.  I read and reread it, it doesn't explicitly say it but Is it a common sense type thing? It would seem so. Please tell me they're idiots and not taking the book in context.
ogre achievements 19/101
Common sense has no place in reading warhammer rules :)

How did they come to that conclusion? I can't find anything backing that logic.

Page 103 of the rulebook: 'Round Two?' pretty much says the challenge continues if both competitors live. Unless you can find another passage that says 'with the rule difference of other models can now attack into it', it behaves the same as before
A challenge is only complete if one of the said members is dead or fled.
"Nec sorte nec fato"

Ogre Battles!

Tactica: Sabretusks
Tactica: Gnoblars
A Challenge is a matter of honor for both parties involved, I believe it even says something along those lines in the rule book, anyway, they wont allow people to interfere. Until one is dead or has run away nobody can attack the two models involved in the challenge.
Because it says in the challenge description "they cannot be attacked for that round of combat" I believe that it's THAT word that makes them think otherwise,  because under Round Two? It says that they continue to fight,  it doesn't have the "they can't be attacked " part.
ogre achievements 19/101
Ah, GW's sub-optimal word choice. Had they worded it 'they cannot be attacked by any other model while that challenge continues' your rulemonger friends would not have any argument whatsoever - but they wrote the section like every challenge only lasts one round.

The rule based argument would essentially end up being 'what's the point of a multiround challenge if suddenly everyone else can attack them?'

The common sense based argument (which, as I stated before, has no place here :-P) is 'Good luck convincing a GT Tournament Organizer of that interpertation'

Continue this conversation on GitHub ↗

Opens a new GitHub Issue pre-filled with a link back here — sign in with GitHub to post. If someone already restarted this thread, please add to that issue instead of opening a second one.